MITRE ATLAS catalogues dozens of attack techniques. Not all of them apply equally to your organisation. A company running a customer-facing chatbot has a different risk profile than one running autonomous agents with database write access. This dashboard scores threats specific to your actual AI use cases — not a generic checklist.
The AI Risk Exposure Dashboard™ identifies which AI security threats are most likely to impact your organisation, based on the specific AI use cases you've deployed and the security controls you currently have in place. Rather than presenting every MITRE ATLAS technique as equally relevant, it weights risk by your actual exposure — what AI systems you operate, what data they touch, and what controls are missing — and visualises the result as an interactive heat map.
A generic AI security checklist treats prompt injection, model theft, and supply chain compromise as equally urgent for every organisation. In practice, an organisation running a single customer-facing chatbot with no agent capabilities has minimal exposure to agent tool abuse — that threat simply doesn't apply to their architecture. Meanwhile, an organisation running autonomous agents connected to internal systems has dramatically elevated exposure to exactly that threat category. The Risk Exposure Dashboard exists to produce a threat priority list specific to what you've actually deployed, not a one-size-fits-all framework checklist.
Select the AI use cases active in your organisation: customer-facing chatbot, internal copilot, autonomous agents, RAG-based knowledge systems, AI-powered code generation, and others. Each use case carries a different threat weighting — autonomous agents elevate agent abuse and tool manipulation risk; RAG systems elevate retrieval poisoning and cross-tenant leakage risk; customer-facing systems elevate prompt injection and reputational risk. The dashboard combines your active use cases with your current control coverage to calculate a risk score for each threat category.
The interactive heat map visualises risk severity across threat categories, colour-coded from green (low exposure) through yellow and orange to red (critical exposure). This format is designed for fast executive consumption — a board member can identify the two or three red zones in seconds without needing to understand the underlying technical detail. Clicking into any threat category reveals the specific reasoning: which use cases drive that risk score, and which missing controls contribute most to the exposure.
Beyond the heat map, the dashboard maps your top risk exposures to relevant compliance frameworks — showing which NIST AI RMF functions, EU AI Act requirements, or ISO 27001 controls address your highest-priority threats. This connects risk prioritisation directly to compliance planning, so security investment decisions and regulatory readiness work reinforce each other rather than operating as separate workstreams.
Select your AI use cases and see which threats actually matter for your organisation. Interactive heat map, board-ready PDF.